Microsoft Dynamics GP Architectural Foundations Series - Conclusion

This is article 6 of 7 from the series Microsoft Dynamics GP Architectural Foundations Series - featuring Microsoft's Tim Brookins.

Tim's whitepaper was originally published in 1999 and it's reproduced here with his permission.








Conclusion

A typical architecture white paper will usually babble on about the popular technologies of the day like Client/Server, SQL Server, Thin Clients, Browser Clients, Stored Procedures, FRx, Office Integration, Report Writing, 2-Tier, 3-Tier, ODBC, Internet, Transact SQL, Windows NT, etc.

This document operates at a more strategic level, primarily because the endless list of technologies are changing constantly. In short, technologies come and go, but architectures are built for the long term. Any meaningful discussion of product architecture must be based on principals or philosophies that are technology independent.

The eEnterprise product architecture is based on a single fundamental premise, with four supporting philosophies:

The value of the business management system is contained in the Business Logic.

• The business logic must be Built to Last
• The business logic must be Built to Grow
• The business logic must be Built to Leverage
• The business logic must be Built to Fit

This document has been dedicated to describing these philosophies in detail. When a specific technology like C++ or VBA has been mentioned, it is only an example of how current technologies are being used to support these long-term philosophies.

While I've tried to avoid mentioning specific technologies in order to focus on the long-term architecture, keep in mind that eEnterprise is the industry leader in technology support. Client/Server, SQL Server, Thin Clients, Browser Clients, Stored Procedures, FRx, Office Integration, Report Writing, 2-Tier, 3-Tier, ODBC, Internet, Transact SQL, Windows NT... Yes, eEnterprise supports them all!

But in the end, never allow a laundry list of technologies from any vendor cloud your vision. Always keep in mind that today's "must have" technologies will quickly become tomorrow's "must replace" technologies. Great technology is not enough. Great functionality is not enough. You need a product that has an established track record of sustained technology and functionality leadership that only a superior architecture can deliver. I hope you'll agree the eEnterprise architecture has the solid foundations you can trust to take your business into the future.




In the next article Tim Brookins offers his insight.


Until next post!

MG.-
Mariano Gomez, MVP
Maximum Global Business, LLC
http://www.maximumglobalbusiness.com/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DBMS: 12 Microsoft Dynamics GP: 0 error when updating to Microsoft Dynamics GP 2013 R2

Image
Hello all! It's been quite a while since I've actually written anything of remote interest to anyone who follows my blog, but at the same time, you will be pleased to know that I've been quite busy in the consulting front, with upgrades, server migrations, complex multi-instance postings involving 10's of thousands of transactions, wrapping up some Field Service Automation projects, and the list goes on and on. This time around I want to bring to the forefront, an issue I encountered updating  from Microsoft Dynamics GP 2013 SP2 to Microsoft Dynamics GP 2013 R2 plus the latest service pack. Background My client requested a server migration to a new environment where they wanted to deploy Dynamics GP 2013 R2 web client (plus the latest service pack) and upgrade their relational database management system to Microsoft SQL Server 2014. This is something I'm absolutely comfortable with (for the most part) given also that my client was sitting at Microsoft Dynamics...
Read more

Do I have to use those "Z-" currency IDs in GP?

Image
I know this seems like a trivia question, but recently I have come across a number of clients who have been using Microsoft Dynamics GP for a number of years and have been told by their former partners that they *must* use the predefined currency IDs created after adding the sample company, with no real explanation to support these claims. Case in point, my new client in Saudi Arabia, has been struggling for years to understand why they were told to prefix all currency IDs with the "Z-". So they went ahead and setup "Z-SR" for the Saudi Real. If you are familiar with Microsoft Dynamics GP and the sample company, Fabrikam, you may have noticed by now that after adding the sample company (which is not a requirement by any means), you will get a number of predefined currencies such as Z-US$ (US Dollars), Z-UK (British Pounds), Z-C$ (Canadian Dollars), Z-AUD (Australian Dollars), and so forth, accompanied by a number of exchange rate tables. If you are not familiar wi...
Read more

Microsoft Dynamics GP Scrolling Windows and Line Sequence Numbers

Image
I thought I would write about something meaningless that no one really thinks about. However, I realized that this is a compelling topic since it makes for some interesting discussion around the ability to insert line items withinin most transaction scrolling windows. Let’s take some time to understand where Line Sequence Numbers come from. A Line Sequence Number is auto generated by Dynamics GP and uses a seed value of 16,384 as a basis for the first line. Each subsequent line in the scrolling window is incremented by this number, so line number 2 would have a Line Sequence Number value of 32,768, line number 3 would have Line Sequence Number Value of 49,152, and so on. Since most GP transaction entry scrolling windows allow inserting rows in between line items, the newly inserted Line Sequence Number value is calculated as an average between the previous and the next line item sequences, i.e., if you were to insert an item in between row 1 and row 2 in the scrolling window -- keep in...
Read more